4.7 Article

Linkage and sequence analysis of neutral oligosaccharides by negative-ion MALDI tandem mass spectrometry with laser-induced dissociation

期刊

ANALYTICA CHIMICA ACTA
卷 1071, 期 -, 页码 25-35

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2019.04.067

关键词

Negative-ion matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization tandem mass spectrometry; Laser-induced dissociation; Linkage analysis; Gluco-oligosaccharides; Blood-group related antigens; Typing

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31600650, 31671369]
  2. March of Dimes (Arlington, VA, U.S.A) Prematurity Research Center [22-FY18-821]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mass spectrometry (MS) has become the primary method for high-sensitivity structural determination of oligosaccharides. Fragmentation in the negative-ion MS can provide a wealth of structural information and these can be used for sequence determination. However, although negative-ion MS of neutral oligosaccharide using the deprotonated molecule [M-H](-) as the precursor has been very successful for electrospray ionization (ESI), it has only limited success for matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization (MALDI). In the present study, the features of negative-ion MALDI primary spectra were investigated in detail and the product-ion spectra using [M-H](-) and [M+Cl](-) as the precursors were carefully compared. The formation of [M-H](- )was the main difficulty for MALDI while [M+Cl](-) was proved to be useful as alternative precursor anion for MALDI-MS/MS to produce similar fragmentation for sequencing of neutral oligosaccharides. N-(1-naphthyl)ethylenediamine dihydrochloride was then used as both the matrix and the Cl- dopant to evaluate the extent of structural information that can be obtained by negative-ion fragmentation from [M+Cl](-) using laser-induced dissociation (LID)-MS/MS for linkage assignment of gluco-oligosaccharides and for typing of blood-group ABO(H) and Lewis antigens on either type 1 or type 2 backbone-chains. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据