4.5 Article

Solubility behavior of δ-AlOOH and ε-FeOOH at high pressures

期刊

AMERICAN MINERALOGIST
卷 104, 期 10, 页码 1416-1420

出版社

MINERALOGICAL SOC AMER
DOI: 10.2138/am-2019-7064

关键词

Solubility behavior; delta-AlOOH; epsilon-FeOOH; high pressures; Physics and Chemistry of Earth's Deep Mantle and Core

资金

  1. JSPS KAKENHI [18J12511, 26247073, 15H05828, 18H03740]
  2. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS)
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [18J12511, 26247073, 18H03740] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Low-pressure polymorphs of AlOOH and FeOOH are common natural oxyhydroxides at the Earth's surface, which may transport hydrogen to the deep mantle via subduction. At elevated pressures, the low-pressure polymorphs transform into delta-AlOOH and epsilon-FeOOH with CaCl2-type structure, which form a solid solution above 18 GPa. Nevertheless, few studies have examined the solid solution behavior of this binary system in detail. In this study, we ascertain the phase relations in the AlOOH-FeOOH binary system at 15-25 GPa and 700-1200 degrees C. X-ray diffraction (XRD) measurements of quenched samples show that delta-AlOOH and epsilon-FeOOH partly form solid solutions over wide pressure and temperature ranges. Our results demonstrate that a binary eutectic diagram is formed without dehydration or melting below 1200 degrees C at 20 GPa. We also observe that the maximum solubilities of Al and Fe in the solid solutions are more strongly influenced by temperature than pressure. Our results suggest that the CaCl2-type hydroxides subducted into the deep mantle form a solid solution over a wide composition range. As AlOOH and FeOOH are present in hydrous crust, these phases may be subducted into the deep interior, transporting a significant amount of hydrogen to deeper regions. Therefore, a better understanding of this binary system may help elucidate the model geodynamic processes associated with the deep water cycling in the Earth.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据