4.3 Article

VALIDATION OF THE WITHDRAWAL ASSESSMENT TOOL-1 IN ADULT INTENSIVE CARE PATIENTS

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE
卷 28, 期 5, 页码 361-+

出版社

AMER ASSOC CRITICAL CARE NURSES
DOI: 10.4037/ajcc2019559

关键词

-

资金

  1. Hospira/Pfizer Canada

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background The Withdrawal Assessment Tool-1 (WAT-1) has been validated for assessing iatrogenic withdrawal syndrome in critically ill children receiving mechanical ventilation, but little is known about this syndrome in critically ill adults. Objective To evaluate the validity and reliability of the WAT-1 in critically ill adults. Methods A prospective, observational, open-cohort pilot study of critically ill adults receiving mechanical ventilation and regular administration of opioids for at least 72 hours. Patients were assessed for withdrawal twice daily on weekdays and once daily on weekends using the WAT-1 after an opioid weaning episode. The presence of iatrogenic withdrawal syndrome was evaluated once daily using modified Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (Fifth Edition) (DSM-5) criteria. All evaluations were blinded and performed independently. The criterion validity of the WAT-1 and the interrater reliability for WAT-1 and DSM-5 evaluations were determined. Results During 8 months, 52 adults (median age, 51.5 years) were enrolled. Eight patients (15%) had at least 1 positive assessment during their intensive care unit stay using the DSM-5, compared with 19 patients (37%) using the WAT-1. The overall sensitivity of the WAT-1 was 50%, and its specificity was 65.9%. Agreement between WAT-1 and DSM-5 assessments was poor (kappa = 0.102). The interrater reliability for the WAT-1 was 89.1% and for the DSM-5 was 90.1%. Conclusion Despite showing reliability, the WAT-1 is not a valid tool for assessing the presence of iatrogenic withdrawal syndrome in adults.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据