4.8 Article

Highly Efficient Sodium Storage in Iron Oxide Nanotube Arrays Enabled by Built-In Electric Field

期刊

ADVANCED MATERIALS
卷 31, 期 41, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adma.201902603

关键词

performance; iron oxide; sodium-ion batteries

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51872192, 51772197, 51672182]
  2. Thousand Young Talents Plan
  3. Jiangsu Natural Science Foundation [BK20180002]
  4. Key University Science Research Project of Jiangsu Province [19KJA170001, 17KJA430013]
  5. 333 High-Level Talents Project in Jiangsu Province
  6. Six Talent Peaks Project in Jiangsu Province
  7. Priority Academic Program Development (PAPD) of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions

向作者/读者索取更多资源

High-power sodium-ion batteries capable of charging and discharging rapidly and durably are eagerly demanded to replace current lithium-ion batteries. However, poor activity and instable cycling of common sodium anode materials represent a huge barrier for practical deployment. A smart design of ordered nanotube arrays of iron oxide (Fe2O3) is presented as efficient sodium anode, simply enabled by surface sulfurization. The resulted heterostructure of oxide and sulfide spontaneously develops a built-in electric field, which reduces the activation energy and accelerates charge transport significantly. Benefiting from the synergy of ordered architecture and built-in electric field, such arrays exhibit a large reversible capacity, a superior rate capability, and a high retention of 91% up to 200 cycles at a high rate of 5 A g(-1), outperforming most reported iron oxide electrodes. Furthermore, full cells based on the Fe2O3 array anode and the Na-0.67(Mn0.67Ni0.23Mg0.1)O-2 cathode deliver a specific energy of 142 Wh kg(-1) at a power density of 330 W kg(-1) (based on both active electrodes), demonstrating a great potential in practical application. This material design may open a new door in engineering efficient anode based on earth-abundant materials.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据