4.8 Article

Electrochemical Diagram of an Ultrathin Lithium Metal Anode in Pouch Cells

期刊

ADVANCED MATERIALS
卷 31, 期 37, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adma.201902785

关键词

dead Li; failure mechanism; lithium metal anodes; polarization; pouch cell; short circuit

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program [2016YFA0202500, 2015CB932500]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21676160, 21825501, 21805161, U1801257]
  3. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2018M631480]
  4. Tsinghua National Laboratory for Information Science and Technology
  5. Tsinghua University Initiative Scientific Research Program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Lithium (Li) metal is regarded as a Holy Grail electrode for next-generation high-energy-density batteries. However, the electrochemical behavior of the Li anode under a practical working state is poorly understood, leading to a gap in the design strategy and the aim of efficient Li anodes. The electrochemical diagram to reveal failure mechanisms of ultrathin Li in pouch cells is demonstrated. The working mode of the Li metal anode ranging from 1.0 mA cm(-2)/1.0 mAh cm(-2) (28.0 mA/28.0 mAh) to 10.0 mA cm(-2)/10.0 mAh cm(-2) (280.0 mA/280.0 mAh) is investigated and divided into three categories: polarization, transition, and short-circuit zones. Powdering and the induced polarization are the main reasons for the failure of the Li electrode at small current density and capacity, while short-circuit occurs with the damage of the separator leading to safety concerns being dominant at large current and capacity. The electrochemical diagram is attributed from the distinctive plating/stripping behaviors of Li metal, accompanied by dendrites thickening and/or lengthening, and heterogeneous distribution of dendrites. A clear understanding in the electrochemical diagram of ultrathin Li is the primary step to rationally design an effective Li electrode and render a Li metal battery with high energy density, long lifespan, and enhanced safety.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据