4.3 Article

Assessment of anisotropic mechanical properties of a 3D printed carbon whisker reinforced composite

期刊

ADVANCED COMPOSITE MATERIALS
卷 28, 期 5, 页码 545-560

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/09243046.2019.1652030

关键词

3D printing; material extrusion additive manufacturing; carbon whisker; composite; anisotropy; mechanical properties; multiscale modeling

资金

  1. Dept. of Engineering Science and Mechanics (Pennsylvania State University)
  2. Center for Innovative Materials Processing through Direct Digital Deposition (Pennsylvania State University)
  3. Composites Materials Laboratory (Pennsylvania State University)
  4. Schreyer Honors College (Pennsylvania State University)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A commercial carbon whisker reinforced polylactic acid composite made by a type of three-dimensional (3D) printing known as material extrusion additive manufacturing is investigated. The primary objective is to experimentally characterize and model the direction-dependent tensile modulus of elasticity of unidirectionally printed composite material to assess the degree of anisotropy induced during printing and to determine how well the measured properties can be predicted by multiscale mechanics-based models. The model predictions are based on microstructural characteristics such as the aspect ratio and orientation of the whiskers and the constituent volume fractions. Other material characteristics are assumed, such the cylindrical shape of voids in the matrix and the perfect bonding condition of the whiskers. The experiments indicate (1) that the modulus in the 0-deg. printed direction can be at least twice the modulus in the 90-deg. printed direction and (2) that whisker alignment is improved during printing. Two models accounting for imperfect whisker alignment are used to predict the modulus of the 0-deg. material reasonably well, although the 90-deg. modulus is over-predicted by both models. The 0-deg. direction is roughly two times stronger than the 90-deg. direction in tension.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据