4.8 Article

Printing Smart Inks of Redox-Responsive Organometallic Polymers on Microelectrode Arrays for Molecular Sensing

期刊

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
卷 11, 期 40, 页码 37060-37068

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.9b11927

关键词

inkjet printing; electrochemical sensors; poly(ferrocenylsilane) (PFS); microelectrode array (MEA) chip; drop-on-demand (DoD)

资金

  1. Marie Curie initial training network Complex Wetting Phenomena (CoWet) [607861]
  2. DruIDe project
  3. Interreg V project
  4. MESA+ Institute for Nanotechnology of the University of Twente

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Printing arrays of responsive spots for multiplexed sensing with electrochemical readout requires new molecules and precise, high-throughput deposition of active compounds on microelectrodes with spatial control. We have designed and developed new redox-responsive polymers, featuring a poly(ferrocenylsilane) (PFS) backbone and side groups with disulfide units, which allow an efficient and stable bonding to Au substrates, using sulfur-gold coupling chemistry in a grafting-to approach. The polymer molecules can be employed for area selective molecular sensing following their deposition by high-precision inkjet printing. The new PFS derivatives, which serve as molecular inks, were characterized by H-1 NMR, C-13 NMR, and FTIR spectroscopies and by gel permeation chromatography. The viscosity and surface tension of the inks were assessed by rheology and pendant drop contact angle measurements, respectively. Commercial microelectrode arrays were modified with the new PFS ink by using inkjet printing in the drop-on-demand mode. FTIR spectroscopy, AFM, and EDX-SEM confirmed a successful, spatially localized PFS modification of the individual electrodes within the sensing cells of the microelectrode arrays. The potential application of these devices to act as an electrochemical sensor array was demonstrated with a model analyte, ascorbic acid, by using cyclic voltammetry and amperometric measurements.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据