4.8 Article

Alkylamine-Integrated Metal-Organic Framework-Based Waveguide Sensors for Efficient Detection of Carbon Dioxide from Humid Gas Streams

期刊

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
卷 11, 期 36, 页码 33489-33496

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.9b12052

关键词

carbon dioxide sensing; metal organic framework thin film; water mitigation; post-synthetic modification; optical fiber sensor

资金

  1. RSS contract [89243318CFE000003]
  2. Department of Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory, an agency of the United States Government
  3. Leidos Research Support Team (LRST)
  4. US Department of Energy's Fossil Energy Crosscutting Technology Research Program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Metal-organic framework (MOF)-based chemical sensors have recently been demonstrated to be highly selective, sensitive, and reversible for CO2 sensing across a range of platforms including optical fiber and surface acoustic wave-based sensors. However, interference of water molecules is a primary issue in CO2 sensing systems based upon MOF layers due to cross-sensitivity, stability of MOF-based materials in humid conditions, and associated baseline drift over the lifetime of sensors. Herein, we develop a simple approach of alleviating the negative effect of water vapor to the optical fiber sensor by using alkylamine (i.e., oleylamine) to form a protective hydrophobic layer on the surface of MOFs for improving water stability. Alkylamine-modification of a MOF-coated optical fiber sensor provides a reversible and stable sensing response to a wide range of CO2 concentrations while also enhancing the CO2 sensitivity of the sensor under wet conditions. The FT-IR and breakthrough studies on the oleylamine-modified MOF confirm that the water vapor does not adversely impact the intrinsic CO2 sorption capacities. Thus, this simple stratrgy for enhancing the CO2/H2O selectivity in the MOF sorbent could also be useful for improving CO2 capture/separation performance in flue gas stream.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据