4.8 Article

Surface Modification with Gallium Coating as Nonwetting Surfaces for Gallium-Based Liquid Metal Droplet Manipulation

期刊

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
卷 11, 期 38, 页码 35488-35495

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.9b12493

关键词

liquid metals; nonwetting; Ga nanoparticles; gallium alloys; surfaces

资金

  1. United States National Science Foundation [NSF ECCS-1710824, NSF ECCS-1908779]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We report gallium (Ga) coating as a simple approach to convert most common microfluidic substrates to nonwetting surfaces against surface-oxidized gallium-based liquid metal alloys. These alloys are readily oxidized in ambient air and adhere to almost all surfaces, which imposes significant challenges in mobilizing liquid metal droplets without leaving residue. Various flat substrates (e.g., PDMS, Si, SiO2, SU-8, glass, and parylene-C coated PDMS) were coated with thin film (75-200 nm in thickness) of gallium by evaporation and the coated gallium formed nanoscale uneven and rough surface through Ostwald ripening with its surface covered with oxide shell. Static and dynamic contact angles of the gallium-coated surfaces were found to be greater than 160 degrees, while dynamic contact angle measurements showed contact angle hysteresis in the range of 6.5-24.4 degrees. Surface-oxidized gallium-based liquid metal alloy droplets were shown to bounce off and roll on the gallium-coated surfaces without leaving any residue which confirms the nonwettability of the gallium-coated flat surfaces. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and atomic force microscopy (AFM) showed the gallium-coated flat substrates consist of nanoscale hemispherical structures with average surface roughness of 33.8 nm. Pneumatic actuation of surface-oxidized liquid metal droplets in PDMS microfluidic channels coated with gallium was conducted to confirm the feasibility of utilizing gallium coating as an effective surface modification for surface-oxidized gallium-based liquid metal droplet manipulation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据