4.8 Article

Cancer Cell Membrane-Biomimetic Nanoplatform for Enhanced Sonodynamic Therapy on Breast Cancer via Autophagy Regulation Strategy

期刊

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
卷 11, 期 36, 页码 32729-32738

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.9b10948

关键词

sonodynamic therapy; hollow mesoporous titanium dioxide; autophagy regulation; biomimetic; homologous targeting

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [U1704172]
  2. Key Program for Basic Research of Universities in Henan province [192x005]
  3. Chinese Postdoctoral Funding Association [2018 M640686, 2019 T120643]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Autophagy was considered as a double-edged sword that might cooperate, aggravate, or antagonize apoptosis. We found that the sonodynamic therapy (SDT) in low dosage induced autophagy and might function as a survival pathway for breast cancer and exhibit resistance to SDT-mediated apoptosis. In this sense, it was highly desired to enhance SDT via autophagy regulation strategy. Herein, we reported a biomimetic nanoplatform based on hollow mesoporous titanium dioxide nanoparticles (HMTNPs) by autophagy inhibitor (hydroxychloroquine sulphate, HCQ) loading and cancer cell membrane (CCM) coating. Owing to the biomimetic surface functionalization, the CCM-HMTNPs/HCQ could escape from macrophage phagocytosis, actively recognize and home in on the tumor by homologous targeting ability. Afterward, the released HCQin response to the ultrasound stimulus was capable of blocking the autophagic flux and cutting off the nutrients supply derived from the damaged organelles, which was anticipated to abrogate the cells' resistance to SDT. Meanwhile, the vessel normalization effect of HCQ alleviated the tumor hypoxia, which was bound to enhance the oxygen-dependent HMTNPs-mediated SDT treatment. Based on the above findings, it was undoubtedly logical that CCM-HMTNPs/HCQ would sensitize breast cancer cells to SDT via autophagy regulation strategy, which held a great promise in cancer treatment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据