4.8 Article

Development of Multifunctional Clay-Based Nanomedicine for Elimination of Primary Invasive Breast Cancer and Prevention of Its Lung Metastasis and Distant Inoculation

期刊

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
卷 11, 期 39, 页码 35566-35576

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.9b11746

关键词

layered double hydroxides; multifunctional nanomedicine; photothermal therapy; chemotherapy; cancer immunotherapy

资金

  1. Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences [XDA12040215]
  2. International Partnership Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences [122111KYSB20180005]
  3. Australian Research Council (ARC) [DP170104643, DP190103486]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cancer recurrence and metastasis are world-wide challenges but current bimodular strategies such as combined radiotherapy and chemotherapy (CTX), and photothermal therapy (PTT) and immunotherapy have succeeded only in some limited cases. Thus in the present study, a multifunctional nanomedicine has been rationally designed via elegantly integrating three FDA-approved therapeutics, that is, indocyanine green (for PTT), doxorubicin (for CTX), and CpG (for immunotherapy) into the structure of layered double hydroxide (LDH) nanoparticles, aiming to completely prevent the recurrence and metastasis of invasive breast cancer. This multifunctional hybrid nano medicine has been demonstrated to eliminate the primary tumor and efficiently prevent tumor recurrence and lung metastasis through combined PTT/CTX and induction of specific and strong immune responses mediated by the hybrid nanomedicine in a 4T1 breast cancer mouse model. Furthermore, the promoted in situ immunity has significantly inhibited the growth of reinoculated distant tumors. Altogether, our multifunctional LDH-based nanomedicine has showed an excellent efficacy in invasive cancer treatment using much lower doses of three FDA-approved therapeutics, providing a preclinical/clinical alternative to cost-effectively treat invasive breast cancer.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据