4.7 Review

Melatonin Mediated Regulation of Drought Stress: Physiological and Molecular Aspects

期刊

PLANTS-BASEL
卷 8, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/plants8070190

关键词

abiotic stress; plant stress physiology; oxidative stress; water deficit conditions; water stress

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2018YFD1000600]
  2. Independent research topics of the State Key Laboratory of Subtropical Silviculture [ZY20180208, ZY20180308]
  3. Key Research and Development Program of Zhejiang Province [2018C02004]
  4. Key Project of Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation [LZ18C160001]
  5. Fruit Innovation Team Project of Zhejiang Province [2016C02052-12]
  6. National Undergraduate Innovation and Entrepreneurship Training Project [201610341010]
  7. Undergraduate Science and Technology Innovation Plan of Zhejiang Province [2017R412006]
  8. Undergraduate Research Training Program in Zhejiang A F University [102-2013200005, 102-2013200041, 102-2013200042, KX20180047, KX20180043, KX20180065]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Drought stress adversely effects physiological and biochemical processes of plants, leading to a reduction in plant productivity. Plants try to protect themselves via activation of their internal defense system, but severe drought causes dysfunction of this defense system. The imbalance between generation and scavenging of reactive oxygen species (ROS) leads to oxidative stress. Melatonin, a multifunctional molecule, has the potential to protect plants from the adverse effects of drought stress by enhancing the ROS scavenging efficiency. It helps in protection of photosynthetic apparatus and reduction of drought induced oxidative stress. Melatonin regulates plant processes at a molecular level, which results in providing better resistance against drought stress. In this review, the authors have discussed various physiological and molecular aspects regulated by melatonin in plants under drought conditions, along with their underlying mechanisms.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据