4.7 Article

Flowering and Morphogenesis of Kalanchoe in Response to Quality and Intensity of Night Interruption Light

期刊

PLANTS-BASEL
卷 8, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/plants8040090

关键词

light intensity; light quality; light spectrum; night break; photomorphogenesis

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea [2016R1D1A3B03933450]
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea [2016R1D1A3B03933450] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The effects of the quality and intensity of night interruption light (NIL) on the flowering and morphogenesis of kalanchoe (Kalanchoe blossfeldiana) Lipstick' and Spain' were investigated. Plants were raised in a closed-type plant factory under 250 molm(-2)s(-1) PPFD white light emitting diodes (LEDs) with additional light treatments. These treatments were designated long day (LD, 16 h light, 8 h dark), short day (SD, 8 h light, 16 h dark), and SD with a 4 h night interruption (NI). The NIL was constructed from 10 molm(-2)s(-1) or 20 molm(-2)s(-1) PPFD blue (NI-B), red (NI-R), white (NI-W), or blue and white (NI-BW) LEDs. In Spain', the SPAD value, area and thickness of leaves and plant height increased in the NI treatment as compared to the SD treatment. In Lipstick', most morphogenetic characteristics in the NI treatment showed no significant difference to those in the SD treatment. For both cultivars, plants in SD were significantly shorter than those in other treatments. The flowering of Kalanchoe Lipstick' was not affected by the NIL quality, while Kalanchoe Spain' flowered when grown in SD and 10 molm(-2)s(-1) PPFD NI-B. These results suggest that the NIL quality and intensity affect the morphogenesis and flowering of kalanchoe, and that different cultivars are affected differently. There is a need to further assess the effects of the NIL quality and intensity on the morphogenesis and flowering of short-day plants for practical NIL applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据