4.6 Review

T-lymphocyte in ANCA-associated vasculitis: what do we know? A pathophysiological and therapeutic approach

期刊

CLINICAL KIDNEY JOURNAL
卷 12, 期 4, 页码 503-511

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/ckj/sfz029

关键词

ANCA; crescentic glomerulonephritis; cytokine; glomerulonephritis; immunology; T-lymphocyte

资金

  1. Programa Comite de Recerca-HUB de Formacio Post-Residencia en Recerca, Convocatoria d'Ajuts per la Recerca Clinica 2016 (IDIBELL Biomedical Research Institute)
  2. European Regional Development Funds ISCIII, Red Tematica de Investigacion Cooperativa en Salud Red de Investigacion Renal [RD16/0009/0003]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis (AAV) is an autoimmune condition that commonly causes kidney impairment and can be fatal. The key participation of B-lymphocytes as ANCA producers and neutrophils as target of these antibodies is widely described as the mechanism of endothelial damage in this disease. There has been a rising interest in the role of T-lymphocytes in AAV in recent years. Evidence is strong from animal models, and T-lymphocytes can be found infiltrating kidney tissue and other tissue sites in AAV patients. Furthermore, the different subsets of T-lymphocytes are also key players in the aberrant immune response observed in AAV. Polarization towards a predominant Th1 and Th17 response in the acute phase of the disease has been described, along with a decline in the number of T-regulatory lymphocytes, which, in turn, show functional impairment. Interactions between different T-cell subsets, and between T-cells and neutrophils and B-cells, also enhance the inflammatory response, constituting a complex network. Novel therapies targeting T-cell immunity are emerging in this scenario and may constitute an interesting alternative to conventional therapy in selected patients. This review aims to summarize the available evidence regarding T-cell imbalances and functional impairment, especially focusing on renal involvement of AAV.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据