4.5 Article

PANINI: Pangenome Neighbour Identification for Bacterial Populations

期刊

MICROBIAL GENOMICS
卷 5, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

MICROBIOLOGY SOC
DOI: 10.1099/mgen.0.000220

关键词

pangenome; microbial population genomics; machine learning; web application

资金

  1. Centre for Genomic Pathogen Surveillance
  2. Wellcome Trust [099202, 104169/Z/14/Z]
  3. MRC [MR/N019296/1]
  4. ERC [742158]
  5. COIN Centre of Excellence
  6. NTD Modelling Consortium by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation
  7. Task Force for Global Health
  8. Royal Society [104169/Z/14/Z]
  9. NIHR Global Health Research Unit on Genomic Surveillance of Antimicrobial Resistance
  10. Sir Henry Dale Fellowship
  11. MRC [MR/R015600/1, MR/N019296/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  12. Wellcome Trust [104169/Z/14/Z] Funding Source: Wellcome Trust

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The standard workhorse for genomic analysis of the evolution of bacterial populations is phylogenetic modelling of mutations in the core genome. However, a notable amount of information about evolutionary and transmission processes in diverse populations can be lost unless the accessory genome is also taken into consideration. Here, we introduce PANINI (Pangenome Neighbour Identification for Bacterial Populations), a computationally scalable method for identifying the neighbours for each isolate in a data set using unsupervised machine learning with stochastic neighbour embedding based on the t-SNE (t-distributed stochastic neighbour embedding) algorithm. PANINI is browser-based and integrates with the Microreact platform for rapid online visualization and exploration of both core and accessory genome evolutionary signals, together with relevant epidemiological, geographical, temporal and other metadata. Several case studies with single- and multi-clone pneumococcal populations are presented to demonstrate the ability to identify biologically important signals from gene content data. PANINI is available at http://panini.pathogen.watch and code at http://gitlab.com/cgps/panini.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据