4.7 Article

Alveolar macrophages generate a noncanonical NRF2-driven transcriptional response to Mycobacterium tuberculosis in vivo

期刊

SCIENCE IMMUNOLOGY
卷 4, 期 37, 页码 -

出版社

AMER ASSOC ADVANCEMENT SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1126/sciimmunol.aaw6693

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease of the NIH [U19AI106761, U19AI135976, U19AI100627, R01AI032972]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Alveolar macrophages (AMs) are the first cells to be infected during Mycobacterium tuberculosis (M.tb.) infection. Thus, the AM response to infection is the first of many steps leading to initiation of the adaptive immune response required for efficient control of infection. A hallmark of M.tb. infection is the slow initiation of the adaptive response, yet the mechanisms responsible for this are largely unknown. To study the initial AM response to infection, we developed a system to identify, sort, and analyze M.tb.-infected AMs from the lung within the first 10 days of infection. In contrast to what has been previously described using in vitro systems, M.tb.-infected AMs up-regulate a cell-protective antioxidant transcriptional signature that is dependent on the lung environment but not bacterial virulence. Computational approaches including pathway analysis and transcription factor motif enrichment analysis identify NRF2 as a master regulator of the response. Using knockout mouse models, we demonstrate that NRF2 drives expression of the cell-protective signature in AMs and impairs the control of early bacterial growth. AMs up-regulate a substantial pro-inflammatory response to M.tb. infection only 10 days after infection, yet comparisons with bystander AMs from the same infected animals demonstrate that M.tb.-infected AMs generate a less robust inflammatory response than the uninfected cells around them. Our findings demonstrate that the initial macrophage response to M.tb. in the lung is far less inflammatory than has previously been described by in vitro systems and may impede the overall host response to infection.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据