4.4 Article

Room-temperature heterodyne terahertz detection with quantum-level sensitivity

期刊

NATURE ASTRONOMY
卷 3, 期 11, 页码 977-982

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41550-019-0828-6

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) Strategic University Research Partnerships Program
  2. Office of Naval Research [N00014-14-1-0573]
  3. National Science Foundation [1305931]
  4. Department of Energy [DE-SC0016925]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Our Universe is most radiant at terahertz frequencies (0.1-10.0 THz) (ref. (1)), providing critical information on the formation of the planets, stars and galaxies, as well as the atmospheric constituents of the planets, their moons, comets and asteroids(2-9). The detection of faint fluxes of photons at terahertz frequencies is crucial for many planetary, cosmological and astrophysical studies(10-14). For example, understanding the physics and molecular chemistry of the life cycle of stars and their relationship with the interstellar medium in galaxies requires heterodyne detectors with noise temperatures close to the quantum limit(15). Near-quantum-limited heterodyne terahertz detection has so far been possible only through the use of cryogenically cooled superconducting mixers as frequency downconverters(15-18). Here we introduce a heterodyne terahertz detection scheme that uses plasmonic photomixing for frequency downconversion to offer quantum-level sensitivities at room temperature. Frequency downconversion is achieved by mixing terahertz radiation and a heterodyning optical beam with a terahertz beat frequency in a plasmonics-enhanced semiconductor active region. We demonstrate terahertz detection sensitivities down to three times the quantum limit at room temperature. With a versatile design capable of broadband operation over a 0.1-5.0 THz bandwidth, this plasmonic photomixer has broad applicability to astronomy, cosmology, atmospheric studies, gas sensing and quantum optics.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据