4.5 Article

Preparation for industrial pellet production from blends of eucalyptus sawdust and hydrolysis lignin: the optimal variable combinations of co-pelletization

期刊

BIOMASS CONVERSION AND BIOREFINERY
卷 10, 期 2, 页码 513-521

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s13399-019-00444-y

关键词

Biomass pellet fuel; Eucalyptus sawdust; Hydrolysis lignin; Response surface methodology; Relaxed density; Optimal variable combination

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51661145022]
  2. Guangdong Provincial Natural Science Foundation Project [2017B030308002]
  3. Chinese Academy of Sciences Key Laboratory of Renewable Energy [y807j91001]
  4. Heilongjiang Science and Technology Planning Project [KS2018KH0090]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The technology of co-pelletization was adopted to improve the performance of eucalyptus sawdust pellets, and hydrolysis lignin was treated as an effective binder. The main objective of this work was to obtain the optimal variable combinations of co-pelletization for preparation of industrial production. Response surface methodology using a central composite design with five-factor and five-level was employed to design and obtain the optimal variable combinations. Single pellet-making experiments were carried out using a uniaxial piston-cylinder densification apparatus. The effect of variables on responses was analyzed in detail. The selected optimal models for responses are all modified quadratic expressed in the form of regression equations. By setting the desired values of the responses, the optimized variable combinations are 26% hydrolysis lignin adding amount, 11% moisture content, 107-degrees C temperature, 5500-N pressure, and 3-mm particle size. The validation experiments were performed using the same apparatus according to the optimal variable combinations, and the response values are 24.83 kJ kg(-1) for specific energy consumption, 1048.91 kg m(-3) for relaxed density, and 31.44 N mm(-2) for Meyer hardness. The relative percentage errors between the response predicted values and validation experiment results are all less than 10%.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据