4.7 Article

Impact Assessment of Biological Control-Based Integrated Pest Management in Rice and Maize in the Greater Mekong Subregion

期刊

INSECTS
卷 10, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/insects10080226

关键词

IPM; Trichogramma; Greater Mekong Subregion; biological control; integrated pest management; international development

资金

  1. CABI Development Fund
  2. United Kingdom (Department for International Development)
  3. China (Chinese Ministry of Agriculture)
  4. Australia (Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research)
  5. Canada (Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada)
  6. Netherlands (Directorate-General for International Cooperation)
  7. Switzerland (Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation)
  8. Center for International Agricultural Research, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CIAR-CAAS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The impact and sustainability of two interventions that have been formulated to introduce integrated pest management (IPM) into rice and maize crops in Southwestern China, Laos, and Myanmar between 2011 and 2016, and were assessed at the end of 2017. From 22 Trichogramma rearing facilities established during the interventions, 11 were still producing substantial quantities of biocontrol agents 1.5 years after project support had ended, while seven had stopped operations completely, and four were doing stock rearing only. Through the implementation of biological control-based IPM, slightly higher yields were achieved in maize and rice (4-10%), when compared to control farmers, but the difference was not statistically significant. However, the use of pesticides nearly halved when farmers started using Trichogramma egg-cards as a biological control agent. Support from either public or private institutions was found to be important for ensuring the sustainability of Trichogramma rearing facilities. Many of the suggested IPM measures were not adopted by smallholder farmers, indicating that the positive impacts of the interventions mostly resulted from the application of Trichogramma biological control agents. The following assessment suggests that further promotion of IPM adoption among farmers is needed to upscale the already positive effects of interventions that facilitate reductions in synthetic pesticide use, and the effects on sustainable agricultural production of rice and maize in the target area more generally.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据