4.7 Review

Development of Micro Selective Laser Melting: The State of the Art and Future Perspectives

期刊

ENGINEERING
卷 5, 期 4, 页码 702-720

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.eng.2019.07.002

关键词

Additive manufacturing; Selective laser melting; Microfabrication; Hybrid processing; Powder-bed recoating

资金

  1. Science and Engineering Research Council, Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), Singapore [142 68 00088]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Additive manufacturing (AM) is gaining traction in the manufacturing industry for the fabrication of components with complex geometries using a variety of materials. Selective laser melting (SLM) is a common AM technique that is based on powder-bed fusion (PBF) to process metals; however, it is currently focused only on the fabrication of macroscale and mesoscale components. This paper reviews the state of the art of the SLM of metallic materials at the microscale level. In comparison with the direct writing techniques that are commonly used for micro AM, micro SLM is attractive due to a number of factors, including a faster cycle time, process simplicity, and material versatility. A comprehensive evaluation of various research works and commercial systems for the fabrication of microscale parts using SLM and selective laser sintering (SLS) is conducted. In addition to identifying existing issues with SLM at the microscale, which include powder recoating, laser optics, and powder particle size, this paper details potential future directions. A detailed review of existing recoating methods in powder-bed techniques is conducted, along with a description of emerging efforts to implement dry powder dispensing methods in the AM domain. A number of secondary finishing techniques for AM components are reviewed, with a focus on implementation for microscale features and integration with micro SLM systems. (C) 2019 THE AUTHORS. Published by Elsevier LTD on behalf of Chinese Academy of Engineering and Higher Education Press Limited Company.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据