4.7 Article

Characterization of a Reservoir-Style Implant for Sustained Release of Tenofovir Alafenamide (TAF) for HIV Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP)

期刊

PHARMACEUTICS
卷 11, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics11070315

关键词

poly(epsilon-caprolactone) (PCL); tenofovir alafenamide (TAF); pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP); long-acting drug delivery systems; implant

资金

  1. Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation [OPP1149227]
  2. United States Agency for International Development (USAID) through the U.S. President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) [AID-OAA-A-14-00012]
  3. Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation [OPP1149227] Funding Source: Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Long-acting (LA) HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) offers the potential to improve adherence by lowering the burden of daily or on-demand regimens of antiretroviral (ARV) drugs. This paper details the fabrication and in vitro performance of a subcutaneous and trocar-compatible implant for the LA delivery of tenofovir alafenamide (TAF). The reservoir-style implant comprises an extruded tube of a biodegradable polymer, poly(epsilon-caprolactone) (PCL), filled with a formulation of TAF and castor oil excipient. Parameters that affect the daily release rates of TAF are described, including the surface area of the implant, the thickness of the PCL tube walls (between 45 and 200 mu m), and the properties of the PCL (e.g., crystallinity). In vitro studies show a linear relationship between daily release rates and surface area, demonstrating a membrane-controlled release mechanism from extruded PCL tubes. Release rates of TAF from the implant are inversely proportional to the wall thickness, with release rates between approximately 0.91 and 0.15 mg/day for 45 and 200 mu m, respectively. The sustained release of TAF at 0.28 +/- 0.06 mg/day over the course of 180 days in vitro was achieved. Progress in the development of this implant platform addresses the need for new biomedical approaches to the LA delivery of ARV drugs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据