4.7 Article

Single-cell imaging and transcriptomic analyses of endogenous cardiomyocyte dedifferentiation and cycling

期刊

CELL DISCOVERY
卷 5, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/s41421-019-0095-9

关键词

-

资金

  1. American Heart and Stroke Foundation [15BGIA22410026, 18IPA34110210]
  2. US National Institute of Health (NIH) [R56HL131898, R01HL070748]
  3. John Locke Trust Charitable Foundation
  4. Cell Analysis Facility Flow and Imaging Cytometry Core Lab
  5. Fred Hutch Cancer Center Genomics Core

向作者/读者索取更多资源

While it is recognized that there are low levels of new cardiomyocyte (CM) formation throughout life, the source of these new CM generates much debate. One hypothesis is that these new CMs arise from the proliferation of existing CMs potentially after dedifferentiation although direct evidence for this is lacking. Here we explore the mechanisms responsible for CM renewal in vivo using multi-reporter transgenic mouse models featuring efficient adult CM (ACM) genetic cell fate mapping and real-time cardiomyocyte lineage and dedifferentiation reporting. Our results demonstrate that non-myocytes (e.g., cardiac progenitor cells) contribute negligibly to new ACM formation at baseline or after cardiac injury. In contrast, we found a significant increase in dedifferentiated, cycling CMs in post-infarct hearts. ACM cell cycling was enhanced within the dedifferentiated CM population. Single-nucleus transcriptomic analysis demonstrated that CMs identified with dedifferentiation reporters had significant down-regulation in gene networks for cardiac hypertrophy, contractile, and electrical function, with shifts in metabolic pathways, but up-regulation in signaling pathways and gene sets for active cell cycle, proliferation, and cell survival. The results demonstrate that dedifferentiation may be an important prerequisite for CM proliferation and explain the limited but measurable cardiac myogenesis seen after myocardial infarction (MI).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据