4.6 Article

In Vivo Detection of Circulating Tumor Cells in High-Risk Non-Metastatic Prostate Cancer Patients Undergoing Radiotherapy

期刊

CANCERS
卷 11, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/cancers11070933

关键词

circulating tumor cells; in vivo detection; non-metastatic prostate cancer; radiotherapy

类别

资金

  1. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) as part of the ERA-NET project in Translational Cancer Research (TRANSCAN) Circulating Tumor Cells as Biomarker for Minimal Residual Disease in Prostate Cancer (CTC-SCAN) [I 1220-B19]
  2. Franz Lanyar-Stiftung at the Medical University Graz, Graz, Austria [394]
  3. FWF [I 1220-B19]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

High-risk non-metastatic prostate cancer (PCa) has the potential to progress into lethal disease. Treatment options are manifold but, given a lack of surrogate biomarkers, it remains unclear which treatment offers the best results. Several studies have reported circulating tumor cells (CTCs) to be a prognostic biomarker in metastatic PCa. However, few reports on CTCs in high-risk non-metastatic PCa are available. Herein, we evaluated CTC detection in high-risk non-metastatic PCa patients using the in vivo CellCollector CANCER01 (DC01) and CellSearch system. CTC counts were analyzed and compared before and after radiotherapy (two sampling time points) in 51 high-risk non-metastatic PCa patients and were further compared according to isolation technique; further, CTC counts were correlated to clinical features. Use of DC01 resulted in a significantly higher percentage of CTC-positive samples compared to CellSearch (33.7% vs. 18.6%; p = 0.024) and yielded significantly higher CTC numbers (range: 0-15 vs. 0-5; p = 0.006). Matched pair analysis of samples between two sampling time points showed no difference in CTC counts determined by both techniques. CTC counts were not correlated with clinicopathological features. In vivo enrichment using DC01 has the potential to detect CTC at a higher efficiency compared to CellSearch, suggesting that CTC is a suitable biomarker in high-risk non-metastatic PCa.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据