4.7 Article

Efficacy of the Small Step Program in a Randomized Controlled Trial for Infants under 12 Months Old at Risk of Cerebral Palsy (CP) and Other Neurological Disorders

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE
卷 8, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/jcm8071016

关键词

early intervention; cerebral palsy; development; other neurological disorder; gross motor function; upper limb function; communication

资金

  1. Swedish Research Council [521-2013-3096, 2016-01009]
  2. Stockholm City Council [1411-1372, 20150153]
  3. Stiftelsen Frimurare-Barnhuset
  4. Sunnerdahls Handikappfond
  5. Stiftelsen Olle Engkvist Byggmastare
  6. Stiftelsen Promobilia
  7. Norrbacka-Eugeniastiftelsen
  8. Sven Jerrings Fond
  9. Swedish Research Council [2016-01009] Funding Source: Swedish Research Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The objective was to evaluate the effects of the Small Step Program on general development in children at risk of cerebral palsy (CP) or other neurodevelopmental disorders. A randomized controlled trial compared Small Step with Standard Care in infants recruited at 4-9 months of corrected age (CA). The 35-week intervention targeted mobility, hand use, and communication during distinct periods. The Peabody Developmental Motor Scales(2ed) (PDMS-2) was the primary outcome measure. For statistical analysis, a general linear model used PDMS-2 as the main outcome variable, together with a set of independent variables. Thirty-nine infants were randomized to Small Step (n = 19, age 6.3 months CA (1.62 SD)) or Standard Care (n = 20, age 6.7 months CA (1.96 SD)). Administering PDMS-2 at end of treatment identified no group effect, but an interaction between group and PDMS-2 at baseline was found (p < 0.02). Development was associated with baseline assessments in the Standard Care group, while infants in the Small Step group developed independent of the baseline level, implying that Small Step helped the most affected children to catch up by the end of treatment. This result was sustained at 2 years of age for PDMS-2 and the PEDI mobility scale.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据