4.5 Article

Epidemic of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae in Europe is driven by nosocomial spread

期刊

NATURE MICROBIOLOGY
卷 4, 期 11, 页码 1919-1929

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41564-019-0492-8

关键词

-

资金

  1. Centre for Genomic Pathogen Surveillance, Wellcome Genome Campus, Wellcome [098051, 099202]
  2. NIHR Global Health Research Unit on Genomic Surveillance of Antimicrobial Resistance [NIHR 16/136/111]
  3. ECDC [ECDC/2012/055, OJ/25/04/2012-PROC/2012/036]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Public health interventions to control the current epidemic of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae rely on a comprehensive understanding of its emergence and spread over a wide range of geographical scales. We analysed the genome sequences and epidemiological data of >1,700 K. pneumoniae samples isolated from patients in 244 hospitals in 32 countries during the European Survey of Carbapenemase-Producing Enterobacteriaceae. We demonstrate that carbapenemase acquisition is the main cause of carbapenem resistance and that it occurred across diverse phylogenetic backgrounds. However, 477 of 682 (69.9%) carbapenemase-positive isolates are concentrated in four clonal lineages, sequence types 11,15,101, 258/512 and their derivatives. Combined analysis of the genetic and geographic distances between isolates with different beta-lactam resistance determinants suggests that the propensity of K. pneumoniae to spread in hospital environments correlates with the degree of resistance and that carbapenemase-positive isolates have the highest transmissibility. Indeed, we found that over half of the hospitals that contributed carbapenemase-positive isolates probably experienced within-hospital transmission, and interhospital spread is far more frequent within, rather than between, countries. Finally, we propose a value of 21 for the number of single nucleotide polymorphisms that optimizes the discrimination of hospital clusters and detail the international spread of the successful epidemic lineage, ST258/512.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据