4.6 Article

Spin-Coating Process for 10 cm x 10 cm Perovskite Solar Modules Enabled by Self-Assembly of SnO2 Nanocolloids

期刊

ACS ENERGY LETTERS
卷 4, 期 8, 页码 1845-1851

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsenergylett.9b00953

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Korea government (MSIP) [2017R1A2B3010927]
  2. Technology Development Program to Solve Climate Changes [2018M1A2A2058207]
  3. Global Frontier R&D Program on the Center for Multiscale Energy System [2012M3A6A7054855, 2012M3A6A7054856]
  4. Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea [2018R1A2B2006708]
  5. Ministry of Education [2018R1D1A1B07050694]
  6. National Research Foundation of Korea [2018R1A2B2006708, 2012M3A6A7054855] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recently, scalable perovskite fabrication techniques for large, uniform, and highly crystalline perovskite layers have been developed by controlling the crystal chemistry of perovskite precursors. However, scalable techniques for the electron and hole transport layers (ETL and HTL) have rarely been investigated. A major challenge in a scalable technique is obtaining a uniform, highly crystalline, and ultrathin ETL at a low temperature. Here, large-area SnO2 ETLs are fabricated by an electrostatic self-assembly method. The ETLs coated onto haze FTO show high uniformity without pin holes, as confirmed by an electroluminescence image of the perovskite solar module (PSM). In addition, the uniform and pinhole-free SnO2 coating are indirectly verified by observing the unchanged shunt resistance of the PSC with increasing active area, compared to the conventional SnO2 ETL-based PSC. On the basis of this self-assembly method, PSMs of areas 25 and 100 cm(2) are fabricated with power conversion efficiencies (PCEs) of 15.3 and 14.0% without shunt resistance loss, respectively.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据