Intra arterial treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: Comparison of MELD score variations between radio-embolization and chemo-embolization

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to assess liver function deterioration, as assessed using the model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score variations, following transarterial chemo-embolization (TACE) versus selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) in patients with unresectable unilobar hepatocellular carcinomas (HCC). Patients and methods: We retrospectively evaluated all patients who underwent a single conventional TACE or SIRT procedure in our department from May 2013 to May 2018 for unilobar unresectable HCC. A total of 86 patients (76 men, 20 women; mean age, 65.5 years) were included. There were 63 patients in the TACE group [56 men, 7 women; mean age, 65.1 9.6 (SD) years] and 23 patients in the SIRT group [20 men, 3 women; mean age, 70 9.2 (SD) years]. Delta MELD, defined as post treatment minus pre-treatment MELD score, was considered for liver function deterioration and compared between patients who underwent single lobar treatment of SIRT versus TACE. Results: Patients in SIRT group had significant higher tumor burden, alpha-fetoprotein serum level, and rates of macroscopic vessel invasion. Mean pre-treatment MELD scores did not differ between TACE [mean, 8.41 +/- 1.71 (SD); range: 7.24-9.24] and SIRT groups [mean, 8.36 +/- 1.74 (SD); range: 7.07-9.21] (P=0.896) as well as Child-Pugh class and albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) grade distribution. However, following treatment, mean DettaMELD was greater in TACE group (mean, 0.8] 1.83 [SD]; range: -0.30 -1.31) than in SIRT group (mean, 0.13 1.06 [SD]; range: -0.49-0.32) (P=0.021). At multivariate analysis, SIRT treatment was independently associated with a lower DeltaMELD score than TACE (R= -V.955 [-1.68; 0.4-6]; P =0.017;). Conclusion: Whereas performed in patients with higher tumor burden, SIRT resulted in lower degrees of liver function worsening as assessed using MELD score variations. (C) 2019 Societe francaise de radiologie. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.