4.5 Article

Annotated normal CT data of the abdomen for deep learning: Challenges and strategies for implementation

期刊

DIAGNOSTIC AND INTERVENTIONAL IMAGING
卷 101, 期 1, 页码 35-44

出版社

ELSEVIER MASSON, CORP OFF
DOI: 10.1016/j.diii.2019.05.008

关键词

d Abdominal computed tomography (CT); Image segmentation; Machine learning; Normal structures; Artificial intelligence (AI)

资金

  1. Lustgarten Foundation for Pancreatic Cancer Research

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to report procedures developed to annotate abdominal computed tomography (CT) images from subjects without pancreatic disease that will be used as the input for deep convolutional neural networks (DNN) for development of deep learning algorithms for automatic recognition of a normal pancreas. Materials and methods: Dual-phase contrast-enhanced volumetric CT acquired from 2005 to 2009 from potential kidney donors were retrospectively assessed. Four trained human annotators manually and sequentially annotated 22 structures in each datasets, then expert radiologists confirmed the annotation. For efficient annotation and data management, a commercial software package that supports three-dimensional segmentation was used. Results: A total of 1150 dual-phase CT datasets from 575 subjects were annotated. There were 229 men and 346 women (mean age: 45 +/- 12 years; range: 18-79 years). The mean intraobserver intra-subject dual-phase CT volume difference of alt annotated structures was 4.27 mL (7.65%). The deep network prediction for multi-organ segmentation showed high fidelity with 89.4% and 1.29 mm in terms of mean Dice similarity coefficients and mean surface distances, respectively. Conclusions: A reliable data collection/annotation process for abdominal structures was developed. This process can be used to generate large datasets appropriate for deep learning. (C) 2019 Societe francaise de radiologie. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据