4.7 Article

An Updated Crustal Thickness Map of Central South America Based on Receiver Function Measurements in the Region of the Chaco, Pantanal, and Parana Basins, Southwestern Brazil

期刊

JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SOLID EARTH
卷 124, 期 8, 页码 8491-8505

出版社

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2018JB016811

关键词

crustal thickness; receiver function; South America; Pantanal Basin; Chaco Basin

资金

  1. CNPq
  2. CAPES [301284/2017-2]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Previous compilation of crustal structure in South America had large unsampled areas including the thin crust in the Sub-Andean lowlands, largely estimated by gravity data, and the sparsely sampled Amazon Craton. A deployment of 35 seismic stations in Brazil, Bolivia, Paraguay, Argentina, and Uruguay improved the coverage of the Pantanal Basin in Western Brazil, the intracratonic Parana and the Chaco Basins. Crustal thicknesses and Vp/Vs ratios were estimated with a modified H-k method by producing three stacked traces to enhance the three Moho conversions (the direct Ps and the two multiples Ppps and Ppss). This modified method gives lower uncertainties than previous studies and shows more regional consistency between nearby stations. The temporary stations and the Brazilian Network (RSBR) have characterized the crustal structure as follows. The Parana Basin has a thick crust 40-45 km and average Vp/Vs ratio (1.71-1.77), while the Chaco Basin has a slightly thinner crust (35-40 km) and higher Vp/Vs ratio (1.75-1.79). This confirms the lack of widespread magmatic underplating in the Parana Basin that could be related to the origin of the flood basalts during the South Atlantic opening. A belt of thin crust (30-35 km) with low Vp/Vs (<1.74) is confined to the eastern edge of the Pantanal Basin. Normal crust (38-43 km) is observed along the western edge of the Pantanal, from the southern part of the Amazon craton to the Rio Apa cratonic block. This study, combined with other published data, provides an updated crustal thickness map of South America.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据