4.8 Article

Cloudlet Placement and Task Allocation in Mobile Edge Computing

期刊

IEEE INTERNET OF THINGS JOURNAL
卷 6, 期 3, 页码 5853-5863

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/JIOT.2019.2907605

关键词

Cloudlet placement; delay; energy consumption; mobile edge computing (MEC); task allocation

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [61802018]
  2. Beijing Institute of Technology Research Fund Program for Young Scholars
  3. NSFC [61572347, 61772077, 61370192, 61602039, U1711265]
  4. Beijing Natural Science Foundation [4192050]
  5. CCF-Tencent Open Fund WeBank Special Funding
  6. Program for Guangdong Introducing Innovative and Enterpreneurial Teams [2017ZT07X355]
  7. EU [607584]
  8. H2020 RISE COSAFE Projects [824019]
  9. U.S. Department of Transportation Center for Advanced Multimodal Mobility Solutions and Education [69A3351747133]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mobile edge computing (MEC) offers a way to shorten the cloud servicing delay by building the small-scale cloud infrastructures, such as cloudlets at the network edge, which are in close proximity to end users. On one hand, it is energy consuming and costly to place each cloudlet on each access point (AP) to process the requested tasks. On the other hand, the service provider should provide delay-guaranteed service to end users, otherwise they may get revenue loss. In this paper, we first model how to calculate the task completion delay in MEC and mathematically analyze the energy consumption of different equipments in MEC. Subsequently, we study how to place cloudlets on the network and allocate each requested task to cloudlets and public cloud with the minimum total energy consumption without violating each task's delay requirement. We prove that this problem is NP-hard and propose a Benders decomposition-based algorithm to solve it. We also present a software-defined network (SDN)-based framework to deploy the proposed algorithm. Extensive simulations reveal that the proposed algorithm can achieve an (close-to-)optimal performance in terms of energy consumption and acceptance ratio compared with two benchmark heuristics.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据