4.7 Article

Surface, phase transition and impedance studies of Zr- mutated BaTiO3 lead-free thin films

期刊

RESULTS IN PHYSICS
卷 13, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.rinp.2019.102190

关键词

-

资金

  1. Science and Engineering Research Board, India [SB/EMEQ-193/2013]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Lead (Pb) based electronic materials are facing global restriction due to the toxicity of lead. Presently, there is a need for designing and studying Pb-free thin films. In the present work, we fabricated lead-free Zr-substituted BaZr0.1Ti0.9O3 (BZT10) and BaZr0.2Ti0.8O3 (BZT20) thin films on Pt/TiO2/SiO2/Si substrates by sol-gel method using spin coating technique. The major drawback of BZT solid solutions is high processing temperature (1400 degrees C-1500 degrees C). For fabrication of micro-system devices compatible with the current complementary metal oxide semiconductor (CMOS) technology, the primary requirement is fabrication of BZT thin films at lower processing temperature. So, we have developed BZT thin films at low annealing temperature 750 degrees C. The prepared thin films were characterized by grazing incidence X-ray diffraction (GIXRD) and Raman spectroscopy for structural study. The phase variation from tetragonal to cubic with Zr concentration has been noticed in the structural analysis and is consistent with temperature dependent dielectric study. Surface studies of thin film are related to the functionality of thin film in various technical applications. The average grain size and root mean square (RMS) roughness were calculated from Atomic Force Microscope (AFM) images. Local elastic properties have been analyzed by force modulation mode of AFM. The ferroelectric properties of BZT thin films decrease on increasing Zr content to 20 mol%. Impedance spectroscopy analysis at different bias voltages has been carried out for these lead-free BZT thin films. The high value of dielectric constant and impedance makes BZT worthy material for many technical applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据