4.6 Article

Paeoniflorin inhibits Th1 and Th17 cells in gut-associated lymphoid tissues to produce anti-arthritis activities

期刊

INFLAMMOPHARMACOLOGY
卷 27, 期 6, 页码 1193-1203

出版社

SPRINGER BASEL AG
DOI: 10.1007/s10787-019-00615-3

关键词

Paeoniflorin; Arthritis; Th1 cell; Th17 cell; Gut lymph tissues

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of the People's Republic of China [81573495, 81530098]
  2. Key Technology Projects of China Creation of New Drugs [2017ZX09301013, 2015ZX09501001, CPU2018GF01]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Paeoniflorin shows distinct anti-arthritis and immunoregulatory activities, but its rather low bioavailability via oral administration greatly challenges its known mechanism of in vivo activity. Our data showed that oral administration, instead of intraperitoneal injection, of paeoniflorin significantly reduced the polyarthritis index by 44.4%, reduced paw swelling by 18.4% and delayed the onset of arthritis in collagen-induced arthritis (CIA) mice. Oral paeoniflorin treatment also downregulated the systemic pro-inflammatory cytokines IL-6 (by 52.2%), TNF-alpha (by 57.7%) and IL-1 beta (by 34.1%). A pharmacokinetic study revealed that the maximal plasma concentration of paeoniflorin after oral administration was 4.8 +/- 1.9 mu M in the CIA mice, much lower than the effective concentration in vitro (30 mu M). In contrast, paeoniflorin was highly concentrated in the gut content, intestine and Peyer's patches. T cell analysis showed that paeoniflorin markedly reduced transcription factors of Th1 and Th17, inhibited Th1 by 22.2% and 23.1% and Th17 by 43.2% and 25.4% (p < 0.05) in the mesenteric lymph node and Peyer's patches, respectively. Paeoniflorin did not have a significant impact on Th1 and Th17 in the spleen. For the first time, these data suggest that paeoniflorin accumulates in the intestine and primarily modulates Th1 and Th17 responses in the mesenteric lymph nodes and Peyer's patches, rather than in the spleen, to exert anti-arthritis effects.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据