4.5 Article

Tactile Decoding of Edge Orientation With Artificial Cuneate Neurons in Dynamic Conditions

期刊

FRONTIERS IN NEUROROBOTICS
卷 13, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fnbot.2019.00044

关键词

force and tactile sensing; neuro-robotics; conduction delays; mechanoreceptors; cuneate neurons; biologically-inspired robots; spiking neural networks

资金

  1. Tuscany Region, CENTAURO project [CUP D88C15000210008]
  2. NEBIAS European project [EU-FP7-ICT-611687]
  3. NanoBioTouch European project [EUFP7-NMP-228844]
  4. PARLOMA project - Italian Ministry of Universities, Education and Research within the Smart Cities and Social Innovation [SIN_00132]
  5. Dubai Future Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Generalization ability in tactile sensing for robotic manipulation is a prerequisite to effectively perform tasks in ever-changing environments. In particular, performing dynamic tactile perception is currently beyond the ability of robotic devices. A biomimetic approach to achieve this dexterity is to develop machines combining compliant robotic manipulators with neuroinspired architectures displaying computational adaptation. Here we demonstrate the feasibility of this approach for dynamic touch tasks experimented by integrating our sensing apparatus in a 6 degrees of freedom robotic arm via a soft wrist. We embodied in the system a model of spike-based neuromorphic encoding of tactile stimuli, emulating the discrimination properties of cuneate nucleus neurons based on pathways with differential delay lines. These strategies allowed the system to correctly perform a dynamic touch protocol of edge orientation recognition (ridges from 0 to 40 degrees, with a step of 5 degrees). Crucially, the task was robust to contact noise and was performed with high performance irrespectively of sensing conditions (sensing forces and velocities). These results are a step forward toward the development of robotic arms able to physically interact in real-world environments with tactile sensing.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据