4.5 Article

Thermal X-ray emission identified from the millisecond pulsar PSR J1909-3744

期刊

ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
卷 627, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

EDP SCIENCES S A
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201732040

关键词

stars: neutron; dense matter; equation of state; X-rays: individuals: PSR J1909-3744

资金

  1. CNES
  2. FONDECYT [3150428]
  3. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  4. Observatoire Midi-Pyrenees
  5. ESA Member States
  6. NASA

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Context. Pulsating thermal X-ray emission from millisecond pulsars can be used to obtain constraints on the neutron star equation of state, but to date only five such sources have been identified. Of these five millisecond pulsars, only two have well-constrained neutron star masses, which improve the determination of the radius via modelling of the X-ray waveform. Aims. We aim to find other millisecond pulsars that already have well-constrained mass and distance measurements that show pulsed thermal X-ray emission in order to obtain tight constraints on the neutron star equation of state. Methods. The millisecond pulsar PSR J1909-3744 has an accurately determined mass, M = 1.54 +/- 0.03 M-circle dot (1 sigma - error) and distance, D = 1.07 +/- 0.04 kpc. We analysed XMM-Newton data of this 2.95 ms pulsar to identify the nature of the X-ray emission. Results. We show that the X-ray emission from PSR J1909-3744 appears to be dominated by thermal emission from the polar cap. Only a single component model is required to fit the data. The black-body temperature of this emission is kT = 0.26(0.02)(0.03) keV and we find a 0.2-10 keV un-absorbed flux of 1.1 x 10(-14) erg cm(-2) s(-1) or an un-absorbed luminosity of 1.5 x10(30) erg s(-1). Conclusion. Thanks to the previously determined mass and distance constraints of the neutron star PSR J1909-3744, and its predominantly thermal emission, deep observations of this object with future X-ray facilities should provide useful constraints on the neutron star equation of state.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据