4.8 Article

Boosting High-Rate Li-S Batteries by an MOF-Derived Catalytic Electrode with a Layer-by-Layer Structure

期刊

ADVANCED SCIENCE
卷 6, 期 16, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/advs.201802362

关键词

catalytic effect; layer-by-layer; lithium-sulfur batteries; MOF-derived; ultrafine CoS2 nanoparticles

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China New Energy Project for Electric Vehicle [2016YFB0100204]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51772030]
  3. Joint Funds of the National Natural Science Foundation of China [U1564206]
  4. Major achievements Transformation Project for Central University in Beijing
  5. Beijing Key Research and Development Plan [Z181100004518001]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Rechargeable high-energy lithium-sulfur batteries suffer from rapid capacity decay and poor rate capability due to intrinsically intermediate polysulfides' shuttle effect and sluggish redox kinetics. To tackle these problems simultaneously, a layer-by-layer electrode structure is designed, each layer of which consists of ultrafine CoS2-nanoparticle-embedded porous carbon evenly grown on both sides of reduced graphene oxide (rGO). The CoS2 nanoparticles derived from metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) have an average size of approximate to 10 nm and can facilitate the conversion between Li2S6 and Li2S2/Li2S in the liquid electrolyte by a catalytic effect, leading to improved polysulfide redox kinetics. In addition, the interconnected conductive frameworks with hierarchical pore structure afford fast ion and electron transport and provide sufficient space to confine polysulfides. As a result, the layer-by-layer electrodes exhibit good rate capabilities with 1180.7 and 700 mAh g(-1) at 1.0 and 5.0 C, respectively, and maintain an impressive cycling stability with a low capacity decay of 0.033% per cycle within ultralong 1000 cycles at 5.0 C. Even with a high sulfur loading of 3.0 mg cm(-2), the electrodes still show high rate performance and stable cycling stability over 300 cycles.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据