4.7 Article

Large-Scale Fabrication of Nanostructure on Bio-Metallic Substrate for Surface Enhanced Raman and Fluorescence Scattering

期刊

NANOMATERIALS
卷 9, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/nano9070916

关键词

hierarchical LIPSS; surface-enhanced Raman scattering; surface-enhanced fluorescence; bio-metallic substrate; crystal violet

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2018YFB1107700, 2018YFB1107400, 2016YFB1102503]
  2. National Natural Science Fund of China [51705013]
  3. Beijing Natural Science Foundation [J170002]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The integration of surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) and surface-enhanced fluorescence (SEF) has attracted increasing interest and is highly probable to improve the sensitivity and reproducibility of spectroscopic investigations in biomedical fields. In this work, dual-mode SERS and SEF hierarchical structures have been developed on a single bio-metallic substrate. The hierarchical structure was composed of micro-grooves, nano-particles, and nano-ripples. The crystal violet was selected as reporter molecule and both the intensity of Raman and fluorescence signals were enhanced because of the dual-mode SERS-SEF phenomena with enhancement factors (EFs) of 7.85 x 10(5) and 14.32, respectively. The Raman and fluorescence signals also exhibited good uniformity with the relative standard deviation value of 2.46% and 5.15%, respectively. Moreover, the substrate exhibited high sensitivity with the limits of detection (LOD) as low as 1 x 10(-11) mol/L using Raman spectroscopy and 1 x 10(-10) mol/L by fluorescence spectroscopy. The combined effect of surface plasmon resonance and hot spots induced by the hierarchical laser induced periodical surface structures (LIPSS) was mainly contributed to the enhancement of Raman and fluorescence signal. We propose that the integration of SERS and SEF in a single bio-metallic substrate is promising to improve the sensitivity and reproducibility of detection in biomedical investigations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据