4.3 Article

Particulate matter disrupts airway epithelial barrier via oxidative stress to promote Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection

期刊

JOURNAL OF THORACIC DISEASE
卷 11, 期 6, 页码 2617-2627

出版社

AME PUBL CO
DOI: 10.21037/jtd.2019.05.77

关键词

Particulate matter (PM); BEAS-2B cells; Pseudomonas aeruginosa; tight junctions (TJs)

资金

  1. State Key Basic Research Program project [2015CB553404]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81630001, 81490533, 81770075, 81500026, 81570028, 81600056]
  3. Shanghai Science and Technology Committee grant [15DZ1930600/15DZ1930602/16ZR1405700]
  4. Shanghai Municipal Commission of Health and Family Planning [201540370]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Airborne particulate matter (PM) is associated with increasing susceptibility to respiratory bacterial infection. Tight junctions (TJs) are protein complexes that form airway epithelial barrier against infection. This study aimed to investigate the effects of PM on the airway TJs in response to infection. Methods: The cytotoxicity of PM to BEAS-2B was evaluated. The reactive oxygen species (ROS) production was measured by the flow cytometry. Colony forming units (CFUs) assay and confocal microscopy were utilized to evaluate the number of bacteria. Immunofluorescence and western blot assay were conducted to detect the expressions of Os proteins. Animal models were used to investigate the role of TJs in PM-induced lung injury upon bacterial infection. Results: In vitro, PM decreased cell viability, increased ROS production, and increased the number of intracellular bacteria accompanying by the degradation of TJs. N-acetylcysteine (NAC) significantly reversed the PM-induced bacterial invasion and PM-induced disruption of TJs. In vivo, PM increases bacteria-infected lung injury, lung bacteria burden and blood bacterial dissemination, which was closely correlated to the degradation of TJs. Conclusions: PM disrupts TJs via oxidative stress to promote bacterial infection.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据