4.6 Article

SCINA: A Semi-Supervised Subtyping Algorithm of Single Cells and Bulk Samples

期刊

GENES
卷 10, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/genes10070531

关键词

single-cell RNA-seq; CyTOF; SCINA; HLRCC; RCC; renal cell carcinoma; fumarase; fumarate hydratase

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health (NIH) [R03 ES026397-01, SPORE P50CA196516, CCSG 5P30CA142543]
  2. Center for Translational Medicine of UT Southwestern [SPG2016-018]
  3. UTSW Kidney Cancer SPORE Developmental Research Program [P50CA196516]
  4. Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas [CPRIT RP150596]
  5. KCP Patient Council
  6. Kidney Cancer Coalition

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Advances in single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-Seq) have allowed for comprehensive analyses of single cell data. However, current analyses of scRNA-Seq data usually start from unsupervised clustering or visualization. These methods ignore prior knowledge of transcriptomes and the probable structures of the data. Moreover, cell identification heavily relies on subjective and possibly inaccurate human inspection afterwards. To address these analytical challenges, we developed SCINA (Semi-supervised Category Identification and Assignment), a semi-supervised model that exploits previously established gene signatures using an expectation-maximization (EM) algorithm. SCINA is applicable to scRNA-Seq and flow cytometry/CyTOF data, as well as other data of similar format. We applied SCINA to a wide range of datasets, and showed its accuracy, stability and efficiency, which exceeded most popular unsupervised approaches. SCINA discovered an intermediate stage of oligodendrocytes from mouse brain scRNA-Seq data. SCINA also detected immune cell population changes in cytometry data in a genetically-engineered mouse model. Furthermore, SCINA performed well with bulk gene expression data. Specifically, we identified a new kidney tumor clade with similarity to FH-deficient tumors (FHD), which we refer to as FHD-like tumors (FHDL). Overall, SCINA provides both methodological advances and biological insights from perspectives different from traditional analytical methods.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据