4.5 Article

Physicochemical and Electrochemical Properties of 1,1,2,2-Tetrafluoroethyl-2,2,3,3-Tetrafluoropropyl Ether as a Co-Solvent for High-Voltage Lithium-Ion Electrolytes

期刊

CHEMELECTROCHEM
卷 6, 期 14, 页码 3747-3755

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/celc.201900729

关键词

lithium-ion battery; high-voltage; solvent; fluorinated ether; electrolyte

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21503246]
  2. Ningbo Municipal Government (IAMET Special Fund) [2014A35001-1]
  3. Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China [LY19B030004]
  4. Ningbo Municipal Government (3315 Plan)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Although high-voltage positive electrode materials for high energy density lithium-ion batteries have gained a great attention, the lack of compatible electrolytes with sufficiently high oxidative stability to deliver an excellent cycling ability restricts their practical application. Fluorinated solvents are considered as promising candidates for high-voltage electrolyte solvents. In this study, we select 1,1,2,2-tetrafluoroethyl-2,2,3,3-tetrafluoropropyl ether (TTE) with a high boiling point, low cost, and good SEI-filming ability as a co-solvent of fluoroethylene carbonate-based electrolytes and extensively investigate its physicochemical and electrochemical properties for applications in high-voltage lithium-ion batteries. Our experimental results show that the TTE-containing electrolyte exhibits not only a high oxidative stability up to 5.5 V (vs. Li/Li+), but also excellent wettability with the separator. In addition to high discharge capacity and increased coulombic efficiency of the Li/LiNi0.5Mn1.5O4 half-cell assembled with the TTE-containing electrolyte cycled between 3.0 and 4.9 V, the cell also displays a high rate capability. This work shows that partially fluorinated ethers, e. g., TTE, are promising co-solvents for high-voltage electrolytes that can enable commercial development of high energy density lithium-ion batteries.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据