4.3 Article

The Drosophila protein, Nausicaa, regulates lamellipodial actin dynamics in a Cortactin-dependent manner

期刊

BIOLOGY OPEN
卷 8, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

COMPANY BIOLOGISTS LTD
DOI: 10.1242/bio.038232

关键词

Actin filament dynamics; Cell migration; Cortactin; Cortactin binding proteins

类别

资金

  1. National Science Foundation STEM Grant [NSF1154004]
  2. Reed College Biology Undergraduate Research Fellowship
  3. Reed College Science Research Fellowship
  4. National Institutes of Health [R15 GM122019-01, 2P40OD010949]
  5. National Science Foundation [NSF 716964]
  6. Reed College

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Drosophila CG10915 is an uncharacterized protein coding gene with sequence similarity to human Cortactin-binding protein 2 (CTTNBP2) and Cortactin-binding protein 2 N-terminal-like (CTTNBP2NL). Here, we have named this gene Nausicaa (naus) and characterize it through a combination of quantitative live-cell total internal reflection fluorescence microscopy, electron microscopy, RNAi depletion and genetics. We found that Naus co-localizes with F-actin and Cortactin in the lamellipodia of Drosophila S2R+ and D25c2 cells and this localization is lost following Cortactin or Arp2/3 depletion or by mutations that disrupt a conserved praline patch found in its mammalian homologs. Using permeabilization activated reduction in fluorescence and fluorescence recovery after photobleaching, we find that depletion of Cortactin alters Naus dynamics leading to a decrease in its half-life. Furthermore, we discovered that Naus depletion in S2R+ cells led to a decrease in actin retrograde flow and a lamellipodia characterized by long, unbranched filaments. We demonstrate that these alterations to the dynamics and underlying actin architecture also affect D25c2 cell migration and decrease arborization in Drosophila neurons. We present the hypothesis that Naus functions to slow Cortactin's disassociation from Arp2/3 nucleated branch junctions, thereby increasing both branch nucleation and junction stability.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据