4.8 Article

Remarkable merits of triboelectric nanogenerator than electromagnetic generator for harvesting small-amplitude mechanical energy

期刊

NANO ENERGY
卷 61, 期 -, 页码 111-118

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2019.04.047

关键词

Triboelectric nanogenerator; Electromagnetic generator; Small-amplitude; Mechanical energy; Energy harvesting

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2016YFA0202704]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61671323]
  3. Beijing Talents Foundation [2017000021223TD04]
  4. Beijing Nova Program [Z171100001117054]
  5. Major Projects of Science and Technology in Tianjin [18ZXJMTG00020]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Triboelectric nanogenerator (TENG) is a new energy technology that is as important as traditional electromagnetic generator (EMG) for converting mechanical energy into electricity, which shows great advantages of simple structure, high power density and low-frequency. Here, the effects of motion amplitude for both generators are first taken into consideration. Our result demonstrates that the TENG has a much better performance than that of the EMG at small amplitude. Under fixed operation frequency, the maximum output power of the TENG rapidly grows to saturation with the increase of the amplitude, while that of the EMG grows slowly and gradually. This contrastive characteristic is verified at different frequencies, which has demonstrated that the TENG has dominant scope over the EMG, in not only low-frequency but also small-amplitude. Moreover, electronics powered by the TENG in small-amplitude has been exhibited and an overall comparison of the TENG and EMG is summarized. Beyond low-frequency, this work has verified the small-amplitude is also a remarkable merit of the TENG for harvesting micro-mechanical energy, which has guided the development prospects of TENG as a foundation of the energy for the new era for internet of things, wearable electronics, robotics and artificial intelligence.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据