4.6 Article

Flexible Organic-Inorganic Composite Solid Electrolyte with Asymmetric Structure for Room Temperature Solid -State Li-Ion Batteries

期刊

ACS SUSTAINABLE CHEMISTRY & ENGINEERING
卷 7, 期 19, 页码 15896-15903

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.9b01869

关键词

Asymmetrical structure; LATP; Composite electrolyte; All-solid-state battery; Excellent performance

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China: Tackling Key Technologies for Development and Industrialization of Power Lithium Ion Battery with High Specific Energy [2016YFB0100506]
  2. General Financial Grant from the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2017M622297]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Solid state electrolytes have stimulated research interest due to their promising application in lithium batteries with high safety. In this paper, an asymmetrical structure composite solid electrolyte consisting of Li1.3Al0.3Ti1.7(PO4)(3) (LATP), poly(vinylidene fluoride-hexafluoropropylene) (P(VDF-HFP)), succinonitrile (SN), and a polyimide (PI) film (named ACSE-PI) was fabricated successfully. This solid electrolyte is flexible and can be stable at a high temperature of 150 degrees C. Moreover, it exhibits a wide electrochemical window of 5 V and high ionic conductivity of over 10(-4) S cm(-1). An all-solid-state battery assembled with this electrolyte exhibits excellent performance at ambient temperature. In particular, the specific discharge capacity of LiFePO4/ACSE-PI/Li battery is 168.4, 164.4, 154.9, 143.4, 129.5, and 109.4 mAh g(-1) at a rate of 0.1, 0.2, 0.5, 1, 2, and 5 C, respectively. It also delivers a reversible discharge capacity of 156 mAh g(-1) after 200 cycles at 0.2 C. Notably, the battery can also operate at 4 degrees C, and the discharge capacity is higher than 110 mAh g(-1) after 200 cycles at 0.2 C. Considering the good performances mentioned above, the ACSE-PI electrolyte is appropriate for the practical application of a solid-state Li-ion battery with higher safety.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据