4.6 Article

Realizing Superior Prussian Blue Positive Electrode for Potassium Storage via Ultrathin Nanosheet Assembly

期刊

ACS SUSTAINABLE CHEMISTRY & ENGINEERING
卷 7, 期 13, 页码 11564-11570

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.9b01454

关键词

hierarchical structure; Prussian blue analogues; dissolution-recrystallization strategy; potassium ion batteries; solid-state diffusion

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51832004, 21805219, 51521001]
  2. National Natural Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars [51425204]
  3. National Key R&D Program of China [2016YFA0202603]
  4. Programme of Introducing Talents of Discipline to Universities [B17034]
  5. Yellow Crane Talent (Science & Technology) Program of Wuhan City
  6. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [WUT: 2017IVA100, 2017IVA096, 2017III009, 2017III040]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Prussian blue analogues have attracted growing attention as the positive electrode materials in rechargeable potassium-ion batteries (KIBs) due to the intrinsic open frameworks and high theoretical capacities. However, the bulk synthesized Prussian blue which is accompanied by aggregation inevitably results in the limited K+ ion mobility and suppressed potassium storage performance. In this work, ultrathin nanosheet-assembled hierarchical Prussian blue materials (K1.4Fe4[Fe(CN)(6)](3)) are synthesized via a facile dissolution-recrystallization strategy. On the strength of this architecture, the positive electrode displays both high rate (71 and 24.9 mAh g(-1) at 50 and 600 mA g(-1)) and long life-span properties (75.2% of the primal capacity retained after 100 cycles) for potassium storage. The enhanced diffusion kinetics and structural stability are further demonstrated through the galvanostatic intermittent titration technique analysis and ex-situ X-ray diffraction. Our work provides a new nanostructuring strategy for improving the potassium storage in intercalation electrodes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据