4.7 Review

Advances in Sn-Based Catalysts for Electrochemical CO2 Reduction

期刊

NANO-MICRO LETTERS
卷 11, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

SHANGHAI JIAO TONG UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1007/s40820-019-0293-x

关键词

Greenhouse effect; CO2 electrochemical reduction; Sn-based electrocatalysts

资金

  1. 1000 Youth Talents Plan of National Natural Science Foundation of China [51773092]
  2. Research Foundation of State Key Lab [ZK201717]
  3. Distinguished Young Scientists Program of the National Natural Science Foundation of China [51425301, 21374021, 51673096, U1601214]
  4. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2019M651813]
  5. Youth Project of the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province, China [BK20171008]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

HighlightsThis review summarizes current developments in the fabrication of tin (Sn)-based electrocatalysts for CO2 reduction.Sn-based electrocatalysts are comprehensively summarized in terms of synthesis, catalytic performance, and reaction mechanisms for CO2 electroreduction.The remaining challenges and opportunities for Sn-based electrocatalysts in the field of CO2 electroreduction are briefly proposed and discussed. AbstractThe increasing concentration of CO2 in the atmosphere has led to the greenhouse effect, which greatly affects the climate and the ecological balance of nature. Therefore, converting CO2 into renewable fuels via clean and economical chemical processes has become a great concern for scientists. Electrocatalytic CO2 conversion is a prospective path toward carbon cycling. Among the different electrocatalysts, Sn-based electrocatalysts have been demonstrated as promising catalysts for CO2 electroreduction, producing formate and CO, which are important industrial chemicals. In this review, various Sn-based electrocatalysts are comprehensively summarized in terms of synthesis, catalytic performance, and reaction mechanisms for CO2 electroreduction. Finally, we concisely discuss the current challenges and opportunities of Sn-based electrocatalysts.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据