4.5 Article

Consumption of star fruit juice on pro-inflammatory markers and walking distance in the community dwelling elderly

期刊

ARCHIVES OF GERONTOLOGY AND GERIATRICS
卷 64, 期 -, 页码 6-12

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.archger.2015.12.001

关键词

Star fruit; TNF-alpha; Interleukin; Nitric oxide; 6MWD; Elderly

资金

  1. Thailand Research Fund (TRF) [RDG5220040]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the effect of star fruit juice supplementation on tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha), interleukin-23 (IL-23) and interleukin-2 (IL-2), nitric oxide (NO), and 6 min walking distance (6MWD) in a group of elderly individuals. Methods: Twenty-nine individuals (20 males, 9 females) with a mean age of 72.4 +/- 8.3 years completed this study. A two-week control period was followed by four weeks of 100 g fresh star fruit juice consumption twice per day after meals. Results: Plasma TNF-alpha, IL-23, IL-2, NO and the 6MWD were evaluated twice during the control period (weeks 0 and 2) and once after the star fruit juice consumption (week 6). Results: The results showed that all parameters in the blood did not change significantly during the control period. After 4 weeks of star fruit juice consumption, a significant reduction in NO, TNF-alpha and IL-23 was found; however, there was no change in IL-2. Moreover, the 6MWD increased significantly at week 6, when compared to that at week 0 and 2. Furthermore, the results also showed a significantly positive and negative correlation of NO and TNF-alpha to the 6MWD, but no correlation of IL-23 and IL-2. Conclusion: This preliminary study concluded that consumption of star fruit juice at 100 g twice daily for one month can significantly depress the pro-inflammation cytokines: TNF-alpha, IL-23, and NO, while increasing walking distance. Low TNF-alpha and high NO also present a significant correlation to walking capacity in elderly individuals. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据