4.8 Article

The Cardiac Microenvironment Instructs Divergent Monocyte Fates and Functions in Myocarditis

期刊

CELL REPORTS
卷 28, 期 1, 页码 172-+

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2019.06.007

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIH/NHLBI [R01HL118183, R01HL136586]
  2. American Heart Association (AHA) AWRP Winter [17GRNT33700274]
  3. AHA 2019 Transformational Project Award [19TPA34910007]
  4. Johns Hopkins Autoimmune Disease Research Center O'Leary-Wilson Fellowship
  5. Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health Richard J. and Margaret Conn Himelfarb Student Support fund
  6. Myocarditis Foundation Postdoctoral Fellowship [90072351]
  7. AHA Postdoctoral Fellowship [16POST31330012, 16PRE31170040, 15PRE25400010]
  8. AARDA
  9. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [KL595/2-3]
  10. Matthew Poyner MVP Memorial Myocarditis Research Fund
  11. Katherine E. Welsh Fellowship
  12. Gilead Research Scholar grant

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Two types of monocytes, Ly6C(hi) and Ly6C(lo), infiltrate the heart in murine experimental autoimmune myocarditis (EAM). We discovered a role for cardiac fibroblasts in facilitating monocyte-to-macrophage differentiation of both Ly6C(hi) and Ly6C(lo)cells, allowing these macrophages to perform divergent functions in myocarditis progression. During the acute phase of EAM, IL-17A is highly abundant. It signals through cardiac fibroblasts to attenuate efferocytosis of Ly6C(hi) monocyte-derived macrophages (MDMs) and simultaneously prevents Ly6C(lo) monocyte-to-macrophage differentiation. We demonstrated an inverse clinical correlation between heart IL-17A levels and efferocytic receptor expressions in humans with heart failure (HF). In the absence of IL-17A signaling, Ly6C(hi) MDMs act as robust phagocytes and are less pro-inflammatory, whereas Ly6C(lo) monocytes resume their differentiation into MHCII+ macrophages. We propose that MHCII + Ly6C(lo) MDMs are associated with the reduction of cardiac fibrosis and prevention of the myocarditis sequalae.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据