4.5 Article

The vitamin D status and its effects on life quality among the elderly in Jinan, China

期刊

ARCHIVES OF GERONTOLOGY AND GERIATRICS
卷 62, 期 -, 页码 26-29

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.archger.2015.09.002

关键词

Vitamin D; Hypovitaminosis; Insufficiency; Elderly; Health

资金

  1. Shandong Natural Science Foundation [2004ZX07]
  2. Ministry of Civil Affairs [[2008]47-1]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A challenge for researchers is that vitamin D has many functions in the body, and vitamin D status across the world is not optimistic. There was little data regarding insufficient vitamin D status and its adverse effect on health of elderly Chinese people. So we selected 686 subjects (310 men and 376 women) aged 60-89 years to explore the correlation between vitamin D status and their life quality in a community-based osteoporosis prevention study at Qianfoshan Hospital of Shandong University from 2009 to 2010. All subjects were divided into three groups: vitamin D adequacy [serum 25(OH)D >= 75 nmol/L], hypovitaminosis D (50-74.9 nmol/L), and vitamin D insufficiency (<50 nmol/L). Participants were requested to complete SF-36 health survey. The regression models were used to evaluate respectively the association between 25(OH) D levels and parameters of SF-36. As a result, serum 25(OH) D levels were 58.60 nmol/L in male [95% confidence interval (95% CI): 56.7-60.5 nmol/L] and 54.17 nmol/L in female (95% CI: 52.8-55.8 nmol/L). Vitamin D adequacy was in 19.4% of male and 14.4% of female. With aging, proportions of insufficient vitamin D increased significantly in male (P = 0.004), and in female (P < 0.001). The elderly with hypovitaminosis D got lower scores than that with vitamin D adequacy (almost P < 0.01). Regression analysis showed that vitamin D appeared a positive association with parameters of SF-36 (almost P < 0.001). In conclusion, vitamin D status in the elderly was severely inadequate, which decreased their life quality and cause adverse effect on their health. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据