4.5 Article

Impact of a primary-based telemonitoring programme in HRQOL, satisfaction and usefulness in a sample of older adults with chronic diseases in Valencia (Spain)

期刊

ARCHIVES OF GERONTOLOGY AND GERIATRICS
卷 62, 期 -, 页码 169-175

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.archger.2015.09.008

关键词

Chronic patients; Older adults; Primary care; Telemonitoring; Health related to quality of life; Satisfaction

资金

  1. Agencia Valenciana de Salud of Ministry of Health of Valencia
  2. Valencian Government through the project Prometeo-OpDepTec Fase II [PROMETEUII/2014/074]
  3. Spanish Ministry of Education [AP2010-5354]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Chronic patients are frequent users of healthcare services and are prone to hospital admissions. In Valencia (Spain) the Valcronic programme aims to manage chronic patients through different levels of telemonitoring and telecare. This paper examines the impact of the Valcronic programme on self-perceived HRQOL in a one-year period and on perceptions of satisfaction and usefulness in a sample of older adults with chronic diseases. Methods: The sample (n = 74) was randomly selected from Valcronic users and was stratified considering different variables. HRQOL was assessed using the EQ-5D questionnaire at two points in time: before the beginning of the Valcronic programme and after a one-year follow-up. Satisfaction and usefulness were evaluated one year after users' inclusion. Results: The whole sample experienced improvement, although not significant, of its HRQOL; patients over 75 showed impairment. Patients with at least one problem in the EQ-5D dimensions decreased after one year (82.43% vs. 74.32%). Users' perceptions of satisfaction and usefulness were highly positive. Conclusions: Our sample benefited from the Valcronic programme, experiencing an improvement in their HRQOL, a decreased use of health resources or high satisfaction levels. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据