4.6 Article

Factors associated with long-term prescription of benzodiazepine: a retrospective cohort study using a health insurance database in Japan

期刊

BMJ OPEN
卷 9, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029641

关键词

-

资金

  1. Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, Japan
  2. Health Care Science Institute, Japan

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives Current clinical guidelines discourage long-term prescription of benzodiazepines and Z-drugs (BZD); however, the practice continues to exist. The aim of this study was to investigate the proportion of long-term BZD prescriptions and its risk factors. Design Retrospective cohort study using a health insurance database. Setting Japan. Participants A total of 86 909 patients were identified as outpatients aged 18 to 65 years who started BZD between 1 October 2012 and 1 April 2015. After excluding patients who underwent surgery on the day of first BZD prescription (n=762) and patients without 8 months followup (n=12 103), 74 044 outpatients were analysed. Main outcome measures We investigated the proportion of long-term prescriptions for =8 months among new BZD users. We assessed patient demographics, diagnoses, characteristics of the initial BZD prescription and prescribers as potential predictors of the long-term BZD prescription. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to assess the association between long-term prescription and potential predictors. Results Of the new BZD users, 6687 (9.0%) were consecutively prescribed BZD for >= 8 months. The long-term prescription was significantly associated with mood and neurotic disorder, cancer, prescription by psychiatrists, multiple prescriptions, hypnotics and medium half-life BZD in the initial prescription. Conclusion Despite the recent clinical guidelines, 9% of new BZD users were given prescriptions for more than 8 months. Physicians should be aware of risk factors when prescribing BZDs for the first time.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据