4.5 Article

Predictors of expressed breast milk volume in mothers expressing milk for their preterm infant

出版社

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/archdischild-2015-308321

关键词

-

资金

  1. Philips AVENT (Philips Consumer Lifestyle, Amsterdam, the Netherlands)
  2. UCL Institute of Child Health

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background An understanding of predictors of breast milk production may enable the provision of better advice and support to mothers with preterm infants who may need to express milk for long periods. Objective To investigate factors predicting the amount of milk expressed by mothers for their preterm infant (1) during the first 10 days and (2) during the infant's whole hospital stay. Methods 62 mothers with preterm infants <34 weeks who participated in a randomised trial comparing two breast pumps completed 10-day diaries including weight of milk expressed and questionnaires giving their opinion of the breast pump; 47 mothers provided data on milk expression up to the infant's hospital discharge. Results Significant predictors of 10-day. milk weight in multivariate models were the number of episodes of 'breast feeding' (17 g (95% CI 8 to 26, p=0.001) increase per episode), the use of double versus single pumping (109 (31-186, p=0.007) g/day more) and the number of complete daily records (17 (1-33, p=0.04) g increase/day). Significant multivariate predictors of total milk production were double versus single pumping (491 (55) mUday vs 266 (44) mUday), expressing 500 mUday by day 10 (525 (53) mUday vs 232 (43) mUday) and a higher score for breast pump 'comfort' (best=489 (39) mUday, middle=335 (57) mL/day, worst=311 (78) mL/day). Conclusions These results suggest that relatively simple, modifiable factors can favourably impact milk production in the neonatal intensive care unit setting and emphasise the importance of double pumping, early establishment of milk production and design features of the breast pump that promote comfort.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据